Difference between 1963 and 1979 constitution



Difference between 1963 and 1979 constitution: A constitution is the arrangement of central laws, set up to administer a country. Nonetheless, this arrangement of laws regularly change. What is the principle distinction somewhere in the range of 1963 and 1979 constitution in Nigeria? What dire requirements have caused the progressions in the demonstration of 1963? What number of amendments did the constitution of Nigeria survive? Peruse on to discover! Constitution in Nigeria is the essential official power, which is worked of regulative standards.

They characterize the freedoms and obligation of individuals and the pioneers. Nigeria is a nation, where you can notice a progression of constitutions:

  • 1963 constitution (First Republic)
  • 1979 constitution (Second Republic)
  • 1993 constitution (Third Republic)
  • 1999 constitution (Fourth Republic)

Significant contrasts between the 1963 and 1979 constitution

Constitutional improvement in Nigeria can be for the most part separated into two ages:

  • the pre-freedom or provincial period, which covered 6 protected instruments of 1914, 1922, 1946, 1951, 1954, and 1960;
  • the post-autonomy age, including 3 sacred instruments: 1963, 1979, and 1999.

Republican constitution of 1963

The Republican Constitution was established on September 19, 1963. Notwithstanding, it became effective on October 1, 1963. There were many motivations to change the law of the country at that point, some of them are:

  • it was about time to supplanted the nominative force of the Queen of England as a head of state
  • the nation required an inward change from a country administered by the ruler into an autonomous republic
  • the requirement for organizing and characterizing limits
  • for change inside the administrative organs to give more power and obligation to those, who address the state
  • the requirement for Nigeria to set up its own court of allure and dispose of the Judicial Committee of the British Ivy Council
  • the need for expanding the quantity of seats in the government lawmaking body
  • With the reception of the Nigeria constitution of 1963, the accompanying arrangement of rules was characterized for the country:
  • The Nigerian parliament has the privilege to pass a the demonstration (rather than the British parliament).
  • The Nigerian president will supplant the Queen of England (as the head of state).
  • The president is chosen by the mystery voting form and can be supplanted through the method of reprimand.
  • At the point when the president isn’t in the country, his power is briefly communicated to the parliament.
  • The Supreme Court of Nigeria is the most elevated in the country.
  • The constitution builds up and shields the crucial basic freedoms.
  • The new law annulled the legal advisory commitee.
  • The Senate should expand the quantity of seats from 44 to 56. The places of delegates ought to be extended from 305 to 312.
READ ALSO:   Attack on campaign office: Kano senators write to IGP, point to APC faction chair, commissioner and others

1979 constitution of Nigeria

The accompanying essential elements describe the act of 1979:

  1. The Constitution is the basic law. The wide range of various guidelines ought to be changed by its arrangements.
  2. Three organs of government shared the power. The demonstration set up the Executive President to head the state and be the president of the Armed Forces.
  3. The new law says the president to be picked through the immediate races. He needs to take votes in no less than 66% of the states in Nigeria.
  4. The president ought to have running mates on the races.
  5. One official can satisfy his obligations on the place of the top of a state for quite some time and go for somewhere in the ballpark of two terms. The head of state, too as his “mates”, could be supplanted from the organs of government through the method of prosecution.
  6. As indicated by the new act, the state ought to set up the public financial gathering, which will be going by the Vice-president in collaboration with the legislative leader of the national bank and all state lead representatives.


Photo: thecleanvibes.com


4 significant contrasts between the constitution of 1963 and 1979:

The constitution of 1963 utilized the British Parliamentary or Cabinet System. The demonstration of 1979 took on the American Presidential framework (the Washington Model).

Because of the constitution of 1963, the obligation to head the state and be its true authority of the Armed Forces was laid on the Ceremonial President. The demonstration of 1979 guaranteed similar capacities for the Executive President.

READ ALSO:   [PHOTOS] South-West governors, Miyetti Allah meet

As indicated by the act of 1963, the president was chosen by the places of Parliament, while its “altered rendition” of 1979 referenced that the top of the state would be picked on an overall political race.

The main act of 1963 gave cozy connections to the authoritative and the chief powers. The later demonstration of 1979 drew an unmistakable limit among them and separated their fields of abilities.

As may be obvious, the progressions put into the really official instrument of Nigeria were an essential advance towards better administration, control, and shielding common liberties inside society.



1979 constitution, constitution of nigeria, first republic in nigeria, nigeria constitution